'In her thoroughly enjoyable book, Natasha Gill explores the many complexities in Enlightenment educational thought. Between nature and culture, politics and ethics, these philosophers understood that no society could function without an ambitious educational agenda. In this very well-researched study of eighteenth-century pedagogical debates, Natasha Gill demonstrates with impeccable clarity how Enlightenment views on education are still relevant today, and how much we still need them.' Anne Deneys-Tunney, Professor of French at New York University.

'At a time when some argue that the broader notion of 'education' is once again under threat of being reduced to utilitarian 'instruction', Natasha Gill's intelligent and wide-ranging study helpfully reveals the intellectual origins of this debate as it was framed by the educational theorists of the French Enlightenment.' French Studies

'Philosophers mulling over questions of human potential and improvement have long found pedagogical philosophy appealing and have argued that education represents the best chance to reform society... [this book is] an excellent survey of pedagogical literature... Enlightenment historians will benefit from the careful study of educational philosophy in all of its rich complexity.' H-Albion

'Readers are bound to be impressed by Gill's extensive knowledge and thorough scholarship... Gill takes particular care to set the works and authors studied in their particular social, cultural and political milieu. The comprehensive quality of the volume and its exhaustive treatment of the subject are its unequivocal strengths... scholars of Enlightenment education will appreciate the meticulous analysis and the painstaking comparisons between theories, methods, and principles of various authors.' H-France

'Gill [...] manages to nuance claims of Rousseau's originality and innovativeness by unfolding a rich landscape of philosophical crops sown by Locke and cultivated by several educational theorists preceding Rousseau... Drawing on a pioneering interpretation of Rousseau's less well-known book Emile and Sophie, ou les solitaires, Gill not only nuances the latter's image as an educational Columbus, but also shows how he did not manage to reconcile his pedagogical goal of negative education with his social goal of designing a society in which people can live as free individuals.' Sanne Parlevliet in Paedagogica Historica