An original and compelling history that complicates our understanding of abortion politics in important ways. Ziegler has written a real insiders' account--rich and textured--that comprehensively traces the history of social movements' response to Roe v. Wade, explaining how they developed, navigated internal tensions and external pressures, and made strategic and ideological choices and compromises. She demonstrates that the pro-life/pro-choice split was never inevitable; instead, it emerged in response to a variety of contingencies, including changing political conditions.--Sara Dubow, author of Ourselves Unborn: Fetal Meanings in Modern America
Ziegler's compelling book challenges conventional wisdom about Roe v. Wade's short- and long-term consequences for social movements and the law. Using a wide range of sources, she shows how fluid the abortion debate remained in the decade following Roe, and details how activists on both sides responded in complicated ways to the decision and to other political constraints and opportunities in the 1970s and early 1980s. After Roe makes important and original contributions to constitutional law and legal history, and to the study of women, gender, and sexuality.--Serena Mayeri, author of Reasoning from Race: Feminism, Law, and the Civil Rights Revolution
Resurrects the strange ancestry of the pro-life and pro-choice camps, which, in reality, are anything but.-- "The Economist" (6/20/2015 12:00:00 AM)
This varied and complex story is indeed often 'lost' amid today's entrenched positions...[A] fair-minded analysis.--Margaret O'Brien Steinfels "Commonweal" (10/29/2015 12:00:00 AM)
Ziegler shows the contingencies, shifts, and cross-cutting arguments in the strategies of both sides.--Linda Gordon "Dissent" (4/1/2016 12:00:00 AM)
The story Ziegler tells has considerable relevance today.--Jessica Abrahams "Prospect" (7/1/2015 12:00:00 AM)
The central thesis of Ziegler's new book is that, however important the decision itself, the continuing struggles over abortion policies were largely shaped by politicians and social movements after the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade in 1973...Some observers contend that the court ended what could have been a productive public debate, but Ziegler argues that the decision actually energized the opposing sides, leading them to adopt new strategies and rhetoric. By showing readers how organized reactions to this key decision shaped the politics of abortion, her study may help readers understand what will ensue following the Supreme Court's recent decision regarding same-sex marriage.--M. E. Ethridge "Choice" (11/1/2015 12:00:00 AM)
This fair-minded yet hard-hitting book charts the descent of abortion politics into partisanship and rancor.--Joshua Prager "New York Times" (5/5/2022 12:00:00 AM)
In this landmark study, a law professor peers into our post-Roe future by retracing the contours surrounding the Supreme Court case: The boundaries were fluid, and activists on both sides sought common ground in medical research and pregnancy discrimination. How did the good-faith sparring harden into trench warfare? Ziegler's results may surprise. Pro-choice leaders often ignored specific questions regarding race and socioeconomic class, while anti-choice soldiers were not by definition antifeminist. The eventual binary--does a woman have a Constitutional right to an abortion, yay or nay?--sparked a zero-sum game that will leave political scars for decades.-- "Oprah Daily" (6/24/2022 12:00:00 AM)