Grant's work is vitally important. He has outlined clearly what Russian economic history must do: it must in every case test its clims for uniqueness against, at least, other European cases. The result of such an approach, as Grant shows, will not be the end to claims for Russian uniqueness, of which he uncovers several important cases But we will have a much better grasp of what is unique and what is not.-- "Kritika"
This account offers a valuable examination of the company's industrial strategy as it moved from rail and locomotive production into the manufacture of armaments and warships. Grant's bold thesis that the Pulitov enterprise's strategy resembled that of the leading European arms producers--Vickers, Creusot, Skoda, and Krupp--adds a new and welcome dimension to the lively debate over the nature of Russian capitalism under autocracy.-- "Thomas C. Owen, Louisiana State University"
One of the strengths of the book is the diversity of the author's references, including Nietzsche, T.S. Eliot and Simone de Beauvoir, who she weaves into her text with grace and simplicity.-- "Dance International"
From a judicious analysis of bank records, contracts, correspondence, and annual account books located in Russia's archives and libraries emerges Jonathan A. Grant's fresh interpretation of the Putilov Company's business history, one that challenges the conventional wisdom that entrepreneurial activity in late Imperial Russia was "deviant" . . . Grant's work constitutes a provocative beginning and useful model for future studies of Russia's business history.-- "Journal of Military History"
Grant's case study tests and challenges accepted ideas about Russian capitalism at the end of the Old Regime. The Russian company described here had much in common with West European giants such as Krupp and Vickers, and Grant's book should be read by anyone interested in the question of Russian uniqueness.-- "Susan McCaffray, University of North Carolina at Wilmington"
Grant has done a fine job in crafting a history of [the Putilov Company], and in the process he makes a major contribution to the young field of Russian business history. . . . this tightly focused study deserves to have a broad impact on Russian economic and business history.-- "Enterprise & Society"
There are so few studies of business organisation and practice in tsarist Russia that any contribution to the field ought to be welcomed. Jonathan Grant provides us with a case study of one of the most famous names in imperial Russian business, the Putilov Company. . . . He has written a bried and lucid account of the emergence of this firm, its role within the industrial economy of late imperial Russia.-- "Business History"
The appraoch is refreshing and the questions are valid. Grant shows that the Russian business stategy of the Putilov company was not different or exceptional in comparision to equivalent Western firms. This is an acheivement in itself and quite enough.-- "Journal of Slavic Military Studies"
... there can be no doubt that Grant has produced a very worthwhile book.-- "Revolutionary Russia"