Carmichael's deep description of these individuals' experiences . . . complicate[s] in compelling ways our ideas about American men at arms during the Civil War. . . . Truly eye-opening."--Journal of the Civil War Era
In eloquent and elegant prose, Peter S. Carmichael examines the experience of war for the enlisted soldiers of the Union and Confederate armies. . . . The power and beauty of Carmichael's writing come from his ability to build drama, reveal pathos, and provide texture to the war experience of his disparate group of soldiers."--Journal of Southern History
Fundamentally alters the trajectory of the literature."--Civil War Times Illustrated
A much-needed update of the experience of the Civil War's fighting men on both sides. . . . He illustrates his main points with extensive quotations from primary sources plus a variety of contemporary illustrations that significantly add to the context. Carmichael is both an experienced author and a versatile presenter, and it shows; though the main text is just over 300 pages, his presentation has both breadth and depth. It is, in all, a major achievement."--Choice
Carmichael's work goes a long way toward helping those who might support, or participate in, future conflicts to understand how their predecessors met and overcame significant challenges when called to face their own iterations of injustice."--H-Net Reviews
Carmichael goes deeply into his sources. . . . His search for authentic voices is successful . . . [and points] his readers in interesting, sensitive directions. . . . A powerful addition to getting to the 'real story.'"--Civil War Book Review
Impressive, if not impeccable. . . . The War for the Common Soldier is a serious and important work.".--Civil War News
It is nor possible to expect anyone to write the last word on either the dark side of Civil War soldiering or the persistence model for understanding the combat experience in the Civil War, but Carmichael has given us an important new way to look at both that will serve to bridge the gap between two lines of scholarly inquiry that too often are seen as contradictory or antagonistic."--Earl J. Hess, ARMY Magazine