Both critics and admirers of Tolstoy's great novel were shocked by the savage iconoclasm of his What is Art? when it appeared in 1898. How was it that this great artist could condemn the works of Shakespeare, Raphael, Beethoven and even his own Anna Karenina as 'false art'? Today's reader still has to grapple with that paradox. The essay still has power to challenge and provoke, for it was written by a giant who took art seriously while western civilisation toyed with it as a mere pastime. For Tolstoy, art was as natural and as necessary for humankind as speech.
In his introduction to this translation, W. Gareth Jones shows how vitally Tolstoy's personality and experience of life were engaged in creating What is Art?, how integral the essay was to his art and teaching, and why it continues to demand a response from us.
Flâneur. Writer. MSc Medieval Literatures & Cultures '20 @EdinburghUni. Interests include: heroism, dead languages, classical music.
I am curious about what Russian literature scholars think about Tolstoy's 'What is art?' Just finished it. Tolstoy argues that the music of Liszt, Wagner, late Beethoven, is worthless, same as Shakespeare's plays, and his own 'War and Peace'. I think it's amusing, but no more.
Permanently dormant account to prevent impersonation. I post under the same name elsewhere. Yes, neoliberalism is a thing.
There's a lot that's reactionary or otherwise questionable in Tolstoy's "What is Art?," but his opening gambit of describing a typical musical rehearsal and asking what it is about art that permits us to treat people like garbage resonates.