At a time when researchers were proposing grand plans for general problem solvers and automatic translation machines, Dreyfus predicted that they would fail because their conception of mental functioning was naive, and he suggested that they would do well to acquaint themselves with modern philosophical approaches to human being. "What Computers Still Can't Do" was widely attacked but quietly studied. Dreyfus's arguments are still provocative and focus our attention once again on what it is that makes human beings unique.
Colorist: Sword of Azrael, Grumble, Black Manta, HQAS. Copying Melville's parasocial relationship with Cervantes. she/her mlillustration@gmail.com
@remmettmaxwell On my to read is "Weapons for Math Destruction" Cathy ONiel, "Glitch Feminism" by Legacy Russell, "What Computers Still Can't Do" Hubert Dreyfus
🤡
Has anyone revisited Hubert Dreyfus’ “What computers still can’t do” or “Mind over machine” in the wake of the ChatGPT / AI wildness of late? It may be worthwhile to see how it holds up.
Sharing research as former Dir. of Tech at MIT Museum • I help you keep up with trends in emerging technology & how it will transform your life • Future of Work
4. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason - Hubert L. Dreyfus https://t.co/FlQ9jnrXyw