"What Were We Thinking is crisp, engaging and very smart...There is a simple, piercing clarity to many of Lozada's observations." -New York Times Book Review "A book that solemnly analyses 150 often trashy books about someone who is not known to have read a single book and hired stooges to write the 20 self-puffing volumes published in his name? Yes, Carlos Lozada's survey of what he archly calls 'Trump Studies' is all of those paradoxical things and it is an utter marvel: sober though frequently very funny, fairer minded than the subject deserves, in the end profoundly troubling even as it looks ahead to America's recovery from the Trump malaise." - The Guardian "An immensely valuable book... Thoughtful, clever and engaging... Lozada offers a brilliant, wrenching analysis." -The Washington Post "An elegant yet lacerating volume... In a low period for American democracy, Lozada aims high" - The Guardian "The meta Trump book you didn't know you wanted (and needed) to read... Lozada's book is in conversation with the best books he touches on, by authors like Jill Lepore and Timothy Snyder, drawing out an American narrative that encompasses all its complexity and unmet promise." -The Los Angeles Times "A must-read." -Political Wire "[An] engrossing, insightful book."- The National Book Review "A Rosetta Stone for anyone trying to make sense of the last few years of public debate and discourse." -Vanity Fair "Lozada has written the ultimate hot take on the Trump era of American politics. Unquestionably, the years ahead will be filled with history books about the Trump legacy, but for right now, leaders would be smart to start with this book." - Forbes "Probably the best book about the Trump presidency so far is Carlos Lozada's What Were We Thinking, in which the author, The Washington Post's excellent book critic, read 150 books written during the Trump years and analyzed what their perspectives told us about the man and his time in the White House. His conclusions, and I share them, are that in essence the Trump presidency was uniquely chaotic and yet at the same time a reflection of deeply embedded characteristics of American society." - Peter Osnos