Sartre's formal aim was to establish the dialectical intelligibility of history itself, as what he called 'a totalisation without a totaliser'. But, at the same time, his substantive concern was the structure of class struggle and the fate of mass movements of popular revolt, from the French Revolution at the end of the eighteenth century to the Russian and Chinese revolutions in the twentieth: their ascent, stabilisation, petrification and decline, in a world still overwhelmingly dominated by scarcity.
Fredric Jameson is Distinguished Professor of Comparative Literature at Duke University. The author of numerous books, he has over the last three decades developed a richly nuanced vision of Western culture's relation to political economy. He was a recipient of the 2008 Holberg International Memorial Prize. He is the author of many books, including Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, The Cultural Turn, A Singular Modernity, The Modernist Papers, Archaeologies of the Future, Brecht and Method, Ideologies of Theory, Valences of the Dialectic, The Hegel Variations and Representing Capital.
Investor, Heracles Capital: https://t.co/VMWd6QtHGI | Analyst, Mobile Dev Memo: https://t.co/d8aHtDNdC4 | Developer, Theseus: https://t.co/gW7TUlA8Le.
5/ As he wrote The Critique of Dialectical Reason, Jean-Paul Sartre consumed, on a daily basis, "two packs of cigarettes...more than a quart of alcohol..two hundred milligrams of amphetamines...several grams of barbiturates, plus coffee, tea, rich meals." https://t.co/mS3CNyCXM9
"The Critique is essential to any serious understanding of Sartre."--George Steiner, Sunday Times