A history of the successes of the human rights movement and a case for why human rights work
Evidence for Hope makes the case that yes, human rights work. Critics may counter that the movement is in serious jeopardy or even a questionable byproduct of Western imperialism. Guantánamo is still open and governments are cracking down on NGOs everywhere. But human rights expert Kathryn Sikkink draws on decades of research and fieldwork to provide a rigorous rebuttal to doubts about human rights laws and institutions. Past and current trends indicate that in the long term, human rights movements have been vastly effective. Exploring the strategies that have led to real humanitarian gains since the middle of the twentieth century, Evidence for Hope looks at how essential advances can be sustained for decades to come.
Cognitive scientist at Harvard.
Little @anthlittle & Meng's @annemeng findings are related to those of my colleague Kathryn Sikkink that apparent stasis in human rights over time may be an artifact of rising standards by those assessing the trends. Evidence for Hope | PUP https://t.co/iHnRiq0GjZ