Michael W. Clune's provocative book challenges these objections to judgment and offers a positive account of literary studies as an institution of aesthetic education. It is impossible, Clune argues, to separate judgments about literary value from the practices of interpretation and analysis that constitute any viable model of literary expertise. Clune envisions a progressive politics freed from the strictures of dogmatic equality and enlivened by education in aesthetic judgment, transcending consumer culture and market preferences. Drawing on psychological and philosophical theories of knowledge and perception, Clune advocates for the cultivation of what John Keats called "negative capability," the capacity to place existing criteria in doubt and to discover new concepts and new values in artworks. Moving from theory to practice, Clune takes up works by Keats, Emily Dickinson, Gwendolyn Brooks, Samuel Beckett, and Thomas Bernhard, showing how close reading--the profession's traditional key skill--harnesses judgment to open new modes of perception.
One of the oldest & largest university presses in the US & a distinguished publisher of trade and scholarly books and journals. Refining minds since 1891!
"Literary academics, Clune argues, have been living a contradiction for decades."" The @hedgehogreview reviews Michael Clune's A DEFENSE OF JUDGMENT, "an ambitious attempt to justify the work of judging 'value' in humanistic study." https://t.co/90gjP9pGOi
Essaying the pop culture that matters since 1999. We educate and entertain. Independent, women/LGBTQ-owned. Made by humans.
Michael W. Clune argues in A DEFENSE OF JUDGMENT (@UChicagoPress) that the popular mantra that everyone’s judgment is equal impedes our ability to imagine a world beyond the capitalist marketplace. @doctorbriz #artcritics #literarycriticism #filmcriticis https://t.co/pJoyTBDw55 https://t.co/3rR4g3heDG
Public Books is an online magazine of ideas, arts, and scholarship.
“Literature professors have often had significant difficulty acknowledging their expertise, and corresponding difficulty in justifying their status to skeptics.” @pfessenbecker reviews ‘A Defense of Judgment’ (2021) by Michael W. Clune: https://t.co/NeRsWvzQGG